ഒരു രൂപ മാനനഷ്ടം ചോദിച്ച പൂര്‍വ വിദ്യാര്‍ഥിനിക്ക് 1000 രൂപ പിഴ

September 30, 2011 at 4:54 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

“വിളിച്ചെന്നേ പറയരുത്.. എനിക്ക് പാടില്ലല്ലോ…”

September 30, 2011 at 10:45 am | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

“വിളിച്ചെന്നേ പറയരുത്.. എനിക്ക് പാടില്ലല്ലോ…”
Posted on: 30-Sep-2011 01:08 AM

ലേഖകന്‍ : സാറിന്റെ ഉടമസ്ഥതയിലുള്ള സ്കൂളിലെ ഒരു സംഭവം ഉണ്ടായല്ലോ? പിള്ള: ഉടമസ്ഥതയിലുള്ള സ്കൂളില്‍ ഉണ്ടായിട്ടില്ല, അധ്യാപകന് ഏതോ പ്രശ്നമുള്ളതായി പത്രത്തില്‍ കണ്ടു. എനിക്ക് കോണ്‍ടാക്ട് ഒന്നും ഇല്ലല്ലോ? ഞാന്‍ സാറന്മാരോടും പാര്‍ടിക്കാരോടും പറഞ്ഞിട്ടുണ്ട് അന്വേഷണത്തിന് വേണ്ട നടപടികള്‍ സ്വീകരിക്കണമെന്ന്. എന്റേതായി ഇതൊന്നും ടിവിയില്‍ കൊടുക്കരുത്. ചോദ്യം: സാറാണ് പിന്നിലെന്ന് ബന്ധുക്കള്‍ പറയുന്നല്ലോ? ഉത്തരം: ബന്ധുക്കള്‍ എനിക്ക് എതിരാണല്ലോ? അവരാണ് യഥാര്‍ഥത്തില്‍ … ഒരധ്യാപകന് കൊടുക്കേണ്ട ജോലി തട്ടിയെടുത്തതാണ് അവിടത്തെ പ്രശ്നം. എനിക്ക് പ്രശ്നമില്ല. സാറന്മാരുമായാണ് പ്രശ്നം. എന്നെ കക്ഷി ചേര്‍ത്തപ്പോള്‍ എനിക്ക് വക്കീലിനെ വയ്ക്കാതിരിക്കാന്‍ ആവില്ലല്ലോ… ചോദ്യം: പ്രതിപക്ഷം പറയുന്നത് സാറും ഗണേശ് സാറും ചേര്‍ന്ന് ക്വട്ടേഷന്‍ നല്‍കിയെന്നാണ്… ഉത്തരം: അവര്‍ തെളിയിക്കട്ടെ.. ഞാന്‍ ജയിലിലാ… ആശുപത്രി എന്നു പറഞ്ഞാല്‍ ജീവനക്കാര്‍ സ്ട്രിക്ടാണ്… ഞാന്‍ അത്ര നല്ല അവസ്ഥയിലല്ല ശാരീരികമായിട്ട്… വന്നതിനേക്കാള്‍ ബുദ്ധിമുട്ടിലാണ് കഴിയുന്നത്… ചോദ്യം: ട്രീറ്റ്മെന്റ് ഒക്കെ എങ്ങനെ? ഉത്തരം: അമേരിക്കയില്‍നിന്ന് റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ട് വരേണ്ടതുണ്ട്… വന്നിട്ടില്ല… ട്രീറ്റ്മെന്റ് തുടങ്ങാന്‍ അത് വരണം… ഏതായാലും ഇത് തെളിയുമല്ലോ… പ്രതിപക്ഷനേതാവ് പറഞ്ഞത് തെറ്റാണെന്ന് നിങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് പറയേണ്ടിവരും… ചോദ്യം: ഗണേശ് രാജി വയ്ക്കണമെന്ന ആവശ്യം… ഉത്തരം: അധ്യാപകനെ അഡ്മിറ്റ് ചെയ്ത സമയത്ത് ഒരു കുഴപ്പവും ഇല്ലായിരുന്നെന്നാണ് ഞാന്‍ മനസ്സിലാക്കുന്നത്… എട്ടു മണിക്കൂര്‍ ബോധക്കേട് ഇല്ലായിരുന്നു. ആശുപത്രിയില്‍ അധ്യാപകനെ കാണാന്‍ വന്ന ചില സാറന്മാര്‍ എന്നേയും കാണാന്‍ വന്നിരുന്നു… സ്റ്റാഫ് സെക്രട്ടറിയായ വിവേകാനന്ദന്‍ എന്ന അധ്യാപകനാണ് അയാളെ കൊണ്ടുപോയത്… പല പ്രാവശ്യം ചോദിച്ചിട്ടും ആക്സിഡന്റ് ആണെന്നാണ് പറഞ്ഞത്… പിന്നെ പറയാം പിന്നെ പറയാം എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞിട്ട് ഒന്നും പറഞ്ഞില്ല എന്നാണ് എന്നോട് പറഞ്ഞത്… ചോദ്യം: പൊലീസ് പറയുന്നത് മൊഴിയെടുക്കാന്‍ ആയിട്ടില്ല എന്നാണ്? ഉത്തരം: ഇവിടെ വന്നപ്പോള്‍ ഉള്ള കാര്യമായിരിക്കും… എനിക്ക് അറിയാന്‍ മാര്‍ഗമില്ലല്ലോ… ഞാന്‍ അതിന്റെ പിറകെ അല്ലല്ലോ…പൊലീസ് മൊഴി എടുക്കുമായിരിക്കും… ഞാന്‍ പറഞ്ഞതായിട്ടേ പറയരുത്… ദയവായി എന്നെ ഉപദ്രവിക്കരുത്… ഞാന്‍ കഴിഞ്ഞു പൊയ്ക്കോട്ടെ.. മര്യാദയുടെ പേരിലാണ് ഞാന്‍ ഫോണ്‍ എടുത്തത്… ചോദ്യം: സാറിന്റെ അഭിപ്രായം ജനങ്ങളെ അറിയിക്കേണ്ടേ? എല്ലാവരും കുറ്റപ്പെടുത്തുന്ന അവസ്ഥയാണല്ലോ? ഉത്തരം: ഒരഭിപ്രായവും അറിയിക്കേണ്ട… നിങ്ങള്‍ അന്വേഷിച്ചതായി കൊടുക്കാം… എന്നെ വിളിച്ചെന്നേ പറയരുത്… എനിക്ക് പാടില്ലല്ലോ… ശരിയല്ലല്ലോ… ഞാന്‍ ജയില്‍ശിക്ഷ അനുഭവിക്കുന്നയാളാണ്… പത്രസമ്മേളനമോ പത്രപ്രസ്താവനയോ ഒന്നും എനിക്ക് പാടില്ല… ദയവായി എന്നെ ഉപദ്രവിക്കരുത്… എന്റെ അസുഖം മാറ്റിക്കോട്ടെ… സ്കൂളില്‍ ചെന്ന് അധ്യാപകരോട് അന്വേഷിച്ച് വിവരങ്ങള്‍ ശേഖരിച്ചോളൂ… ഞാന്‍ ഒരഭിപ്രായവും പറഞ്ഞിട്ടില്ല.

http://www.deshabhimani.com/newscontent.php?id=67097

Boy kidnapped for ransom; searching aunt crushed by train

September 30, 2011 at 8:38 am | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

How do we explain these games of Fate….?
Ghaziabad, Sep 29 (IANS) A four-year-old son of a car dealer’s employee was kidnapped for ransom by two men on a motorcycle in Ghaziabad on Thursday, police said. The boy’s aunt was later crushed by a speeding train while she went searching for him.
Karan Bajaj was abducted around 1 pm in Vasundhara neighbourhood, police said, confirming that a ransom call had been received by the family.
Karan’s aunt Nisha, the sister of his father Tejendra Bajaj, was crushed by a train around 7 pm on tracks behind industrial unit Mohan Meakin Ltd.
The two kidnappers came to the gate of the house on a motorcycle around 1 pm when Karan and his grandmother were returning to their house from his school.

“They snatched the boy from his grandmother and escaped,” a police official said.

ഗാര്‍ഹിക പാചകവാതക സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ വെട്ടിക്കുറയ്‌ക്കുന്നത്‌ റിലയന്‍സിനു വേണ്ടി?

September 24, 2011 at 7:15 am | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment
    സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ വെട്ടിക്കുറയ്‌ക്കുന്നത്‌ റിലയന്‍സിനു വേണ്ടി?

തൃശൂര്‍: ഗാര്‍ഹിക പാചകവാതക സിലിണ്ടറുകളുടെ എണ്ണം പരിമിതപ്പെടുത്താനും സബ്‌സിഡി വെട്ടിക്കുറയ്‌ക്കാനുമുള്ള കേന്ദ്രനീക്കം റിലയന്‍സിനെ സഹായിക്കാനാണെന്ന സംശയം ബലപ്പെട്ടു.

നന്ദന്‍ നിലേകാനി സമിതി റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ടിന്റെ അടിസ്‌ഥാനത്തില്‍ ഓരോ വീടിനും വര്‍ഷം നാലു സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ മാത്രമായി കുറയ്‌ക്കാനുള്ള തത്രപ്പാടിലാണു കേന്ദ്രസര്‍ക്കാര്‍. ഇതു മുന്നില്‍ക്കണ്ട്‌ എല്‍.പി.ജി. വിതരണം വിപുലപ്പെടുത്താനുള്ള നീക്കത്തിലാണു റിലയന്‍സ്‌.

2012 ഏപ്രില്‍ മുതല്‍ സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ പരിമിതപ്പെടുത്താനാണു സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ തീരുമാനം. ഈ സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍പോലും വിപണിവിലയ്‌ക്കു വാങ്ങിയശേഷം വര്‍ഷാന്ത്യത്തില്‍ സബ്‌സിഡി തുക ഓരോ പെര്‍മിറ്റിനും വകവച്ചു നല്‍കുന്ന രീതിയാണു പരിഗണിക്കുന്നത്‌. ഇതുസംബന്ധിച്ചു കഴിഞ്ഞദിവസം ചേരാനിരുന്ന മന്ത്രിതലയോഗം രാഷ്‌ട്രീയസമ്മര്‍ദങ്ങളേത്തുടര്‍ന്നു മാറ്റിവച്ചെങ്കിലും അടുത്ത യോഗത്തില്‍ പ്രഖ്യാപനമുണ്ടാകുമെന്നാണു സൂചന.

വീടുകളില്‍ വര്‍ഷം ശരാശരി 6-8 എല്‍.പി.ജി. സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ ഉപയോഗിക്കുന്നുണ്ട്‌. ഭാവിയില്‍, നാലാം സിലിണ്ടറും ആളിത്തീരുന്നതോടെ ഉപയോക്‌താക്കള്‍ക്കു ഗ്യാസ്‌ കുറ്റികള്‍ വേറെ തേടേണ്ടിവരും. ഇതിലാണു റിലയന്‍സിന്റെ കണ്ണ്‌. വിപണിവിലയ്‌ക്കു പാചകവാതകം വാങ്ങണമെങ്കില്‍ നിലവിലെ നിരക്കില്‍ 685 രൂപ നല്‍കേണ്ടിവരും.

സബ്‌സിഡിയും എണ്ണക്കമ്പനികളുടെ ലാഭക്കുറവും രാജ്യത്തിന്റെ സാമ്പത്തികവളര്‍ച്ചയ്‌ക്കു ദോഷമാണത്രേ! ഇക്കാരണം പറഞ്ഞു പെട്രോളിയം മന്ത്രാലയവും ആസൂത്രണ കമ്മിഷനും റിസര്‍വ്‌ ബാങ്കുമെല്ലാം ഒത്തുപിടിക്കുന്നതു റിലയന്‍സ്‌ പോലുള്ള സ്വകാര്യകുത്തകകളെ സഹായിക്കാനാണെന്നാണ്‌ ആരോപണം. പെട്രോള്‍ വിലനിയന്ത്രണം എടുത്തുകളഞ്ഞതോടെ സ്വകാര്യ പെട്രോളിയം കമ്പനികള്‍ വന്‍ലാഭം നേടുന്നുണ്ട്‌. ഡീസല്‍ വില സ്വതന്ത്രമാക്കാനുള്ള സമ്മര്‍ദവും തുടരുകയാണ്‌. ഇതിനൊപ്പം എല്‍.പി.ജി. വിതരണത്തിലെ പരിഷ്‌കാരവും സ്വകാര്യമേഖലയ്‌ക്കു നേട്ടമാകും.

ഭാവിനടപടികള്‍ക്കു മുന്നോടിയായി അടുത്തിടെ പൊതുമേഖലാ കമ്പനികള്‍ ഗ്യാസ്‌ ഏജന്‍സികള്‍ക്കു പല നിര്‍ദേശവും നല്‍കുന്നുണ്ട്‌. കമ്മിഷന്‍ ഗണ്യമായി കുറച്ചതിനെയും വിതരണക്കാര്‍ സംശയത്തോടെയാണു കാണുന്നത്‌. വിതരണവ്യവസ്‌ഥകള്‍ അനാകര്‍ഷകമാക്കി ഏജന്‍സികളെ റിലയന്‍സ്‌ ഗ്യാസിലേക്കു ചുവടുമാറ്റാനുള്ള നീക്കമാണത്രേ ഇത്‌. കൃഷ്‌ണ-ഗോദാവരി തടത്തില്‍ റിലയന്‍സിന്റെ പ്രകൃതിവാതക (എല്‍.എന്‍.ജി) ഖനനം ഊര്‍ജിതമായിട്ടുണ്ട്‌. പെട്രോളിയം മന്ത്രാലയത്തിലെ ഉന്നതരുമായി ഒത്തുകളിച്ചാണു നദീതടത്തില്‍ റിലയന്‍സ്‌ ആധിപത്യമുറപ്പിച്ചത്‌.

വാതക ഇടപാടുകളില്‍ വന്‍ക്രമക്കേടു നടന്നതായി അടുത്തിടെ സി.എ.ജി. കണ്ടെത്തിയിരുന്നു. ഗോദാവരി തടത്തില്‍നിന്നു പ്രകൃതിവാതകം വ്യവസായാടിസ്‌ഥാനത്തില്‍ ഉല്‍പാദിപ്പിച്ചു തുടങ്ങുന്നതോടെ സിറ്റി ഗ്യാസ്‌ പദ്ധതി നടപ്പാക്കാന്‍ റിലയന്‍സ്‌ അധിപനും കോണ്‍ഗ്രസിന്റെ അടുപ്പക്കാരനുമായ മുകേഷ്‌ അംബാനി ലക്ഷ്യമിടുന്നു.

പൈപ്പ്‌ ലൈന്‍ വഴി വാതകം വീടുകളിലെത്തിക്കുന്ന പദ്ധതിയാണിത്‌. സിറ്റി ഗ്യാസ്‌ ശൃംഖല വിജയിക്കാനും സബ്‌സിഡി നിരക്കിലുള്ള ഗ്യാസ്‌ സിലിണ്ടറുകള്‍ അപ്രത്യക്ഷമാകേണ്ടതുണ്ട്‌.

-ശ്രീഹരി രാമകൃഷ്‌ണന്‍ http://mangalam.com/index.php?page=detail&nid=481347&lang=malayalam

ദാരിദ്ര്യരേഖ

September 24, 2011 at 6:04 am | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

ആസൂത്രണ കമീഷന്‍ ദാരിദ്ര്യത്തിന് പുതിയ നിര്‍വചനം കണ്ടെത്തിയത് വിചിത്രമായി തോന്നുന്നു. ഗ്രാമങ്ങളില്‍ പ്രതിദിനം 26 രൂപ വരുമാനമുള്ളവരും നഗരങ്ങളില്‍ 32 രൂപ വരുമാനമുള്ളവരും ദാരിദ്ര്യരേഖയ്ക്ക് മേലെയുള്ള സമ്പന്നരാണെന്നാണ് ആസൂത്രണ കമീഷന്‍ പറയുന്നത്. ബിപിഎല്‍ , എപിഎല്‍ എന്നിങ്ങനെ ജനങ്ങളെയാകെ രണ്ടു തട്ടായി വേര്‍തിരിക്കുന്നതിനാണ് ഈ മാനദണ്ഡം. അവശ്യ സാധനവിലയുടെ കുതിച്ചുകയറ്റം ലോകത്താകെയായി ഈ വര്‍ഷം 4.4 കോടി ജനങ്ങളെക്കൂടി ദാരിദ്ര്യത്തിലേക്ക് തള്ളിവിടുമെന്ന് അന്താരാഷ്ട്ര നാണയനിധി (ഐഎംഎഫ്)യുടെ മാനേജിങ് ഡയറക്ടര്‍ വെളിപ്പെടുത്തിയ സാഹചര്യത്തിലാണ് പുതിയ നിര്‍വചനവുമായി ആസൂത്രണ കമീഷന്‍ രംഗത്തെത്തിയത് എന്നോര്‍ക്കണം. ഒരാള്‍ക്ക് ഒരു നേരത്തെ ഭക്ഷണത്തിന് ഏറ്റവും ചുരുങ്ങിയത് 30 രൂപയെങ്കിലും ചെലവഴിക്കണം. എന്നിട്ടും 26 രൂപ വരുമാനമുള്ളവര്‍ ധനികന്റെ പട്ടികയില്‍പെടുന്നു. ആസൂത്രണ കമീഷന്‍ ദീര്‍ഘനാളത്തെ ഗവേഷണത്തിന് ശേഷമാണ് ഈ നിര്‍വചനത്തില്‍ എത്തിച്ചേര്‍ന്നതെന്നാണ് പറയുന്നത്.

ഭക്ഷണം, വസ്ത്രം, പാര്‍പ്പിടം, വിദ്യാഭ്യാസം എന്നിവയ്ക്കെല്ലാംകൂടി ചെലവഴിക്കേണ്ട ശരാശരി തുകയാണ് ഗ്രാമങ്ങളില്‍ 26 രൂപയും നഗരങ്ങളില്‍ 32 രൂപയും. ബിപിഎല്‍ കുടുംബങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് ചില ആനുകൂല്യങ്ങള്‍ സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ നല്‍കുന്നുണ്ട്. ആനുകൂല്യങ്ങള്‍ ലഭിക്കുന്നവരുടെ എണ്ണം ഗണ്യമായി കുറച്ചുകൊണ്ടുവരുന്നതിനുള്ള സൂത്രവിദ്യയാണ് പുതിയ നിര്‍വചനം. ഭക്ഷ്യസുരക്ഷിതത്വ നയം അട്ടിമറിക്കുകയും ഇതിന്റെ ഉദ്ദേശ്യമാണ്. ചില കേന്ദ്രമന്ത്രിമാര്‍ തന്നെ ഈ നിര്‍വചനത്തെ എതിര്‍ത്തിട്ടുണ്ട്. രാഷ്ട്രീയ പാര്‍ടികളില്‍നിന്നും തൊഴിലാളി സംഘടനകളില്‍നിന്നും ബഹുജനങ്ങളില്‍നിന്നും വ്യാപകമായ എതിര്‍പ്പ് ഇതിനകംതന്നെ ഉയര്‍ന്നുകഴിഞ്ഞു. ഈ നിര്‍വചനം ഉടന്‍തന്നെ ഭേദഗതിചെയ്യാന്‍ ആസൂത്രണ കമീഷന്‍ തയ്യാറായേ മതിയാകൂ.
http://www.deshabhimani.com/newscontent.php?id=64579

Revenge is sweet — at first, anyway

September 24, 2011 at 5:50 am | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

In Wednesday night’s premiere of ABC’s new show “Revenge,” viewers met the seductive, sophisticated Emily Thorne, who returns to Southampton, N.Y., 17 years later to wreak havoc on her father’s enemies. It seems she’ll pick them off one at a time.
But in real life, is revenge really as sweet as it seems?
Actually, it is — at least, it is at first. “When (people) exact revenge, there is genuinely a feeling of relief and even a release of serotonin and oxytocin into the brain that will make someone feel better,” says Mia Bloom, PhD, professor of international studies and women studies at Penn State University.
Even if the act of revenge is as simple as approaching the person who slighted you for a conversation, ignoring an email or sabatoging a co-worker’s project, getting back at the person who’s wronged you can be simply satisfying.
“This is everything from the person who cuts you off in traffic and you show them a certain finger on your hand or you beep at them can be a way of making you feel better,” Bloom explains. “It doesn’t have to be taking an AK-47 and going in and shooting up people who have done you wrong.”
Bloom examined female participation in the world’s most recognized terrorist groups in her book, “Bombshell: Women and Terrorism”, slated for an Oct. 1 release, says women typically resort to acts of terrorism and suicide bombings for five reasons: revenge, redemption, relationship, respect and rape. Like the character in the ABC drama series, the violent acts often aren’t for personal gratification. Most often, they are altruistic or a way of avenging wrongs done to their relatives, communities or religion. Although executing a revenge plot makes us feel better because of the chemical reaction in our brains, Blooms says it also has a dark downside.
“It creates a cycle of violence,” she explains. “The moment a person exacts revenge, there is a response and another response. Violence is never a solution because it becomes never-ending.”
Bloom, who interviewed dozens of women who committed or attempted to commit violent acts include Catholic women in Ireland, Hindu women in Sri Lanka and American women recruited to go to Iraq and Afghanistan, say after the seeking revenge people often experience high levels of guilt, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and other forms of trauma.
“They express regret,” she says. “A failed bombers will say I went to the market, but I saw kids, and they couldn’t cross that line. It’s very difficult to take another life, no matter who that person is and what that person did.”
When’s the last time you got back at someone? Tell us about it, and how you felt afterward. Did it make you feel better? Or did it end up making you feel worse?

Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.
By Kimberly Hayes Taylor
http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/09/22/7901594-revenge-is-sweet-at-first-anyway

Malabar’s Agony – Article By Dr (Mrs) Annie Beasant

September 23, 2011 at 10:04 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

Following is the article titled Malabar’s Agony, which was published in New India on 29 November 1921.

Mrs Annie Besant

It would be well if Mr Gandhi could be taken into Malabar to see with his own eyes the ghastly horrors which have been created by the preaching of himself and his “loved brothers” Mohammad and Shaukat Ali. The Khilafat Raj is established there; on August 1, 1921, sharp to the date first announced by Mr Gandhi for the beginning of Swaraj and the vanishing of British Rule, a Police Inspector was surrounded by Moplahs revolting against that Rule. From the date onwards thousands of the forbidden war knives were secretly made and hidden away and on August 20, the rebellion broke out, Khilafat Flags were hoisted on Police Stations and Government Offices. Strangely enough it was on August 25, 825 AD that Cheraman Perumal ascended the Throne of Malabar, the first Zamorin and from that day the Malayalam Era is dated that is still in use, thus for 1096 years a Zamorin has ruled in Calicut and the Rajahs are mostly chiefs who have long centuries have looked to a Zamorin as their feudatory Head. These are the men on whom the true pacification of Malabar must ultimately depend. The crowded refugees will only return to their devastated homes when they see those once more in safety in their ancestral places. Their lands, which they keep under their own control are largely cultivated by Moplahs, who are normally hardy, industrious agricultural labour.

Our correspondent has sent accounts of public functions connected with my hurried visit to Calicut and Palghat and that which I wish to put on record here is the ghastly misery which prevails, the heart breaking wretchedness which has been caused by the Moplah outbreak, directly due to the violent and unscrupulous attacks on the Government made by the Non-Co-Operators (N.C.O) and the Khilafatists and the statements scattered broadcast, predicting the speedy disappearance of the British rule, and the establishment of Swaraj, as was proclaimed by the N.C.O; Khilafat Raj, as understood by the Moplahs from the declarations of the Khilafatists. On that there is no doubt what ever, so far as Malabar is concerned. The message of the Khilafats, of England as the enemy of Islam, of our coming downfall and the triumph of the Muslims had spread to every Moplah home. The harangues in the mosques spread it everywhere and Muslim hearts were glad. The saw the N.C.O., preachers appealing for help to their religious leaders naturally identifies the two. The Government was Satanic and Eblis to the good Muslim, is to be fought to the death. Mr Gandhi may talk as he pleases about the N.C.Os accepting no responsibility. It is not what they accept; it is what facts demonstrate. He accepted responsibility for the trifling bloodshed of Bombay. The slaughter in Malabar cries out his responsibility. N.C.O. is dead in Malabar. But bitter hatred has arisen there as fighting men from the dragon’s teeth of Theseus. That is the ghastly result of the preaching of Gandhism of N.C.O of Khilafatism. Everyone speaks of the Khilafat Raj and the one hope of the masses in its crushing by the strong arm of the Government. Mr Gandhi asked the Moderates to compel the Government to suspend hostilities i.e. to let loose the wolves to destroy what lives are left. The sympathy of the Moderate is not, I make bold to say, with the murderers, looters, the ravishers who have put into practice the teachings of paralysing the Government of the N.C.Os who have made “war on government” in their own way. How does Mr Gandhi like the Moplah spirit as shown by one of the prisoners in the hospital who was dying from the results of asphyxiation? He asked the surgeon if he was going to die and the surgeon answered that he feared that he would not recover. “Well, I am glad I killed fourteen infidels”, said the “brave, God-fearing Moplah”, whom Mr Gandhi so much admires, who “are fighting for what they consider what they consider as their religion” and in a manner they consider as their religion. Men who considered it “religious” to murder, rape, loot, to kill women and little children, cutting down whole families, have to be put under restrain in any civilized society.

Mr Gandhi was shocked when some Parsi ladies had their sarees torn of and very properly yet the God-fearing hooligans had been taught that it was sinful to wear foreign cloth and doubtless felt they were doing a religious act; can he not feel a little sympathy for thousands of women left with only rags, driven from home, for little children born of the fleeing mothers on roads in refugee camps. The misery is beyond description. Girl-wives, pretty and sweet, with eyes half-blind with weeping, distraught with terror, women who have seen their husbands hacked into pieces before their eyes, in the way “Moplahs consider as religious”, old women tottering whose faces became written with anguish and who cry at a gentle touch and a kind look walking out of a stupor of misery only to weep, men who have lost all hopeless, crushed, desperate, I have walked among thousands of them in their refugee camps and sometimes heavy eyes would lift as a cloth was laid gently on the bare shoulder and a faint watery smile of surprise would make the face even more piteous than the stupor. Eyes full of appeal, of agonized despair, of hopeless entreaty of helpless anguish, thousands of them camp after camp. “Shameful inhumanity proceeding in Malabar” says Mr Gandhi. Shameful inhumanity indeed, wrought by the Moplahs and these are the victims saved from extermination by British and Indian swords. For be it remembered the Moplahs began the whole horrible business the Government intervened to save their victims and these thousands have been saved. Mr Gandhi would have hostilities suspended so that the Moplahs may swoop down on the refugee camps and finish their work.

I visited in Calicut three huge Committee camps, two Christian and the Congress building and compound where doles of rice are given from daily 7 AM to noon. In all their arrangements were good. Big thatched sheds and some buildings sheltered the women and children, the men sleep outside. They are all managed by Indians, the Zamorin Committee distributing clothes and money to all except the Congress Committee which work independently and gives food from its own resource. At Palghat, similar arrangements are made by the Zamorin’s Committee and the order and care in feeding are good to see.

Let me finish with a beautiful story told to me. Two, Pulayas, the lowest of the submerged classes, were captured with others and given the choice between Islam and death. These Pulayas, the outcaste of Hinduism, the untouchables, so loved Hinduism which had been so unkind a step-mother to them that they chose to die Hindu rather than to live Muslim. May the God of both Muslims and Hindus send his messengers to these heroic souls and give them rebirth into the faith for which they died.

Wilful murders of Hindus and arson were first begun in my own place by Chembrasseri Thangal and his lieutenant, another Thangal. You might have read accounts written by me in the Malabar journal which was sent to you last time. This contagion began to spread like wild fire and we began to hear of murders daily. Within a fortnight cold blooded murders of Hindus became very common. From within the borders of Calicut and Ernad Taluks refugees came with tales of murders and atrocities committed by rebels. At Puthur Amsom in Ernad only 12 miles northeast of Calicut, one day in broad daylight twenty five persons who refused to embrace Islam were butchered and put into a well. One out of these too narrowly escaped death got out of the well when the rebels left and ran to Calicut for his dear life. He is now in the hospital. So the accounts must be true as he himself was one of the victims.

During the last week, news of numerous murders and forcible conversions came from another quarter; Mannur near Aniyallur and Kadalundi railway station near Ernad Taluk. This place is only 14 miles from Calicut. Every train to Calicut was carrying with it daily hundreds of refugees during the last week. If there were ten thousand refugees fed by the Relief Committee last week, it must have fed fifteen thousand this week. According to the statement given by them there must be at least fifty murders and numerous cases of conversions and house burnings.

Can you conceive of a more ghastly and inhuman crime than the murders of babies and pregnant women? Two days back I had occasion to read a report given by a refugee in Calicut.

A pregnant woman carrying seven months was cut through the abdomen by a rebel and she was seen lying dead on the way with the dead child projecting out of the womb. How horrible!

Another, a baby of six months was snatched away from the breast of her own mother and cut into two pieces! How heart rending! Are these rebels human beings or monsters?

From the same quarters numerous forcible conversions are also reported. One refugee has given a statement that he had seen with his own eyes that the heads of a dozen people were being shaved by the rebels and afterwards they were asked to recite some passages from the Quran. This he witnessed from a tree. I wonder what is the authority of some people who contradict the news of murders of murders and forcible conversions of Hindus. Let them come here and test the veracity of these statements for themselves.

Yesterday another report of murders came from a place very near Kottakal. The report says that eleven Hindus (males and females) were murdered by the rebels. A fortnight ago fifteen dead bodies of Hindus were seen under culvert on the road between Perinthalmanna and Melatur.

Will you not be sick of these stories of murders? All these reports are as far as possible proved also to be correct. Words fail to express my feelings of indignation and abhorrence which I experienced when I came to know of an instance of rape committed by the rebels under Chembrassery Thangal. A respectable Nair lady at Melatur was stripped naked by the rebels in the presence of her husband and brothers who were made to stand close by with their hands tied behind. When they shut their eyes in abhorrence they were compelled at a point of a sword to open their eyes and witness the rape committed by the brute in their presence. I loathe even to write of such a mean action! This instance of rape was communicated to me by one of her brothers confidentially. There are several instances of such mean atrocities which are not revealed by people.

I thank God that my family and relatives reached safe at Calicut without being dishonoured by these brutes though we sustained serious loss of property and the loss of four lives (two servants and more afterwards).

http://ghatotkacha-nair.blogspot.com/2010/08/malabars-agony-article-2-by-dr-mrs.html

Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion

September 23, 2011 at 10:00 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment
    Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion

Moplah outrage upon a large number of peaceful, unarmed and unprepared Hindus can easily be corroborated by independent testimony.

A redoubtable source straight from the ground on which the Moplahs committed their atrocities was the proceedings of a conference held at Calicut presided over by the Zamorin of Calicut, the Ruler of Malabar. To quote:
“That the conference views with indignation and sorrow the attempts made at various quarters by interested parties to ignore or minimise the crimes committed by the rebels such as:
(a) Brutally dishonouring women
(b) Flaying people alive
(c) Wholesale slaughter of men, women and children
(d) Burning alive entire families
(e) Forcibly converting people in thousands and slaying those who refused to get converted
(f) Throwing half dead people into wells and leaving the victims to struggle for escape till finally released from their suffering by death
(g) Burning a great many and looting practically all Hindu and Christian houses in the disturbed areas in which even Moplah women and children took part and robbed women of even the garments on their bodies, in short reducing the whole non-Muslim population to abject destitution.
(h) Cruelly insulting the religious sentiments of the Hindus by desecrating and destroying numerous temples in the disturbed areas, killing cows within the temple precincts putting their entrails on the holy image and hanging skulls on the walls and the roofs.

Lord Reading, The Viceroy said: “A few European and many Hindus have been murdered, communications have been obstructed; government offices burnt and looted and public records have been destroyed. Hindu temples have been sacked and plundered, houses of Europeans and Hindus burnt. According to reliable reports Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam. One of the most fertile tracts of South India is faced with serious famine. The result has been the temporary collapse of the Civil Government and offices and courts have ceased to function and ordinary business has been brought to a standstill. European and Hindu refugees of all classes are concentrated at Calicut and it is satisfactory to note that they are safe there. One trembles to think of the consequences if the forces of order had not prevailed for the protection of Calicut. Those who are responsible for causing this grave outbreak of violence and crime must be brought to justice and made to suffer the punishment of the guilty.”

A statement refers to the misdeeds of the Muslim Moplahs in these words: “Their wanton and unprovoked attack on the Hindus, the all but wholesale looting of their houses in Ernad etc, the forcible conversion of Hindus in the beginning of the Moplah rebellion and the wholesale conversion of those who stuck to their homes in later stages, the brutal murder of inoffensive Hindus without the slightest reason except that they are “Kafirs” or belonged to the same religion as the policemen, who their mosques, burning of Hindu temples, the outrage on Hindu women and their forcible conversion and marriage by the Moplahs.”

    DURATMA GANDHI – A CRYPTO MUSLIM

This is how K R Phanda described Gandhi in the April 2008 issue of Jana Sangh Today, a monthly magazine of the Akhil Bharatiya Jana Sangh in New Delhi.

Gandhi’s slavish infatuation for the Moplahs was total. He remained unshaken because of his unctuous submissiveness for the barbarous Moplahs. He had nothing but total contempt for the peace- loving Hindus of India.

Contrast the slave-minded Gandhi with Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (1883-1966) an ardent freedom fighter, revolutionary and thinker who is credited with developing the Hindu nationalist political ideology called Hindutva. Savarkar was quite unconcerned about the Muslim reaction to his scheme. He was not perturbed by the Muslim refusal to join in the struggle for Swaraj. He was very conscious of the ancient spiritual strength of the Hindus and the organizing power of the Hindu Maha Sabha and proposed to carry on the struggle, immensely confident that, even alone and unaided, the Hindus will be able to wrest Swaraj from the British. Savarkar was quite prepared to say to the Musalmans: “If you come, with you, if you don’t, without you; and if you oppose, in spite of you—the Hindus will continue to fight for their national freedom as best as they can.” Contrast this with Gandhi, the alleged “apostle of nonviolence”, who on many occasions, decried forceful conversion as a terribly violent act. But regarding the forceful conversion by the Moplahs, he preferred to remain mum.

Gandhi, with his submissive mentality to the abusive Muslims, propagated the lie in ‘Young India’ that the Moplahs, during the said rampage, had converted only a single Hindu to Islam.

Most shamefully Gandhi described the killing of the innocent Hindus by the Moplahs as a heroic deed. In addition to that, he asked the Hindus, for the sake of humanity, not to retaliate.

M.K Gandhi with his twisted mind put forth his political thesis to the effect that every Muslim is a bully and every Hindu is a coward. This was the very basis of Gandhi’s NON-VIOLENCE! Since, according to Gandhi, the Hindu was a coward who will refuse to fight, the Hindu might as well resort to verbal sophistry and high sounding philosophy and justify his lack of violence. Gandhi never believed that the Hindu is capable of fighting his oppressor, so he wanted the Hindus to make a virtue of their inability and unwillingness to fight! If you are a rape victim, then the next time you see the rapist, don’t wait for the rapist to attack you, drop your pants, bend and wait for the rapist to come over and have his way with you. Gandhi’s NON-VIOLENCE was nothing but ‘GANDHIAN’ COWARDICE in the face of the mindless Muslim violence!

Gandhi hid his cowardice under the quack doctrine of Non-Violence, which he took care only to preach to the Hindus and never to his Muslim “Brothers”. He believed himself liberal but was on actual fact afraid of Muslims and he consistently pleaded for the Muslims and pampered them. [‘Anti-Hindus’, by Prafull Goradia and K.R.Phanda. Contemporary Targett Prafull Private Limited, pages 4, 5.] Unfortunately for Gandhi and the Hindus of India, it was a stupid sort of one-sided unrequited love towards the Muslim marauders of India.

On the one hand he called every Hindu a coward and on the other hand he exhorted all the Hindus to remain calm and non-violent even when they were under attack by the marauding Muslims intent on slaughter, loot, gang-rapes and forced conversions. According to Shri V. Sundaram I.A.S,: “Gandhi demonstrated his readiness to sacrifice or sell out vital Hindu interests, Hindu honor and Hindu blood all the time in deference to the feelings of Muslims. Gandhi displayed all his courage only to suppress the Hindus. He was mortally scared of jihadi Muslims. So was Jawaharlal Nehru. Therefore Gandhi had no moral sanction to talk about the cowardice of the Hindus.”

“Gandhi represented the perpetrators of vile deeds as god-fearing people! Was it not a travesty of religion to described men who murder and rape in the name of religion as god-fearing? … Gandhi thus described the Moplah ferocity as the ignorant fanaticism of the Moplah brothers, and the Hindu mentality as cowardliness.” (Mahatma Gandhi, D Keer, pp-402).

Devoid of all sense of decency, propriety, honour and shame, Gandhi deplored the British colonial administration for taking stern action to suppress the savage Islamic jihad against the Hindus of Malabar conducted by the Moplahs.

A Muslim called Khlifa Haji Mehmud of Lurwani, Sindh, once said “Gandhi was really a Mohammedan” (D Keer, p-237).

There is no doubt that the treacherous Gandhi, by supporting the Moplahs, instigated the Muslims to launch attacks on the Hindus in Punjab, Bengal and in other places in the wake of partition. With all due apologies to Shakespeare, I would have to state that all the perfumes of Arabia would not wash the smell of innocent Malabar Hindu blood from Gandhi’s hands!

“After the carnage by the Moplahs, “Maulana” Gandhi started raising money from common people to help, not the Hindu victims, but for the Muslim perpetrators. Many believe that it would have been immensely beneficial for the country, had Gandhi been assassinated at that time.” says Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari.

Mr M.K Gandhi gave this callous, sadistic and barbarous message he gave to the Hindu victims of Moplah rebellion in Young India of 29 September, 1921: “The ending of the Moplah revolt is a matter not only of urgency, but of simple humanity. The Hindus must have the courage and the faith to feel that they can protect their religion in spite of such fanatical eruptions. … Be the Moplahs be ever so bad, they deserve to be treated as human beings.”

To quote the appropriate words of Prafull Goradia in this context: “For Gandhi, no price was too great for appeasing Muslims, so that they did not oppose Hindus. That he did not understand the Muslims was proved by the conduct of the Muslim League and by the vivisection of the country.” The price for Gandhi’s Hindu-Muslim unity was always to be paid by the Hindus.

After the Mutiny of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. By lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, Gandhi inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Muslim violence on Hindus.

This inherent impending danger was clearly foreseen by Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair (1857-1934), a native of Malabar, President of Indian National Congress in 1897 and Law Member of the Viceroy’s Executive Council in 1922.

In his book prophetically titled as ‘Gandhi and Anarchy’ published by Tagore and Company, Madras in 1922 he wrote: ‘It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware that this claim of the Mohammedans to be judged only by the Law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kind. It is well to be clear about this, for not only does the acceptance of the claim of Khilafat as regards India means a real denial of Swaraj, but it also involves Mohammedan rule and Hindu subjection.”

During the Moplah rebellion in Kerala in 1921, thousands of Hindu men, women and children were killed by the Muslims. Hundreds of women were raped. And yet Gandhi supported the Moplahs and not the Hindu victims of Moplah violence and oppression. In fact Gandhi had no sympathy for the Hindus at all.

The great political fraud, the ‘saintly’ hypocrite, also known as the Mahatma, wrote in his ‘Young India’, “it is wrong to say that Islam has employed force. No religion in this world has spread through the use of force. No Musalman, to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion.” According to Gandhi, the Moplah Muslims were guilty of no crime absolutely!

“For sheer brutality on women, I do not remember anything in history to match the Malabar rebellion. It broke out on 20 August, 1921. Even by the 6 September, the results were dreadful. There was complete breakdown of Civil Government resulting in widespread disorder, in political chaos, in anarchy and in ruin.” wrote Sir Sankaran Nair.

Dr (Mrs.) Annie Besant wrote a series of articles in her journal ‘New India’ on 29 November and 6 December 1921 under the caption Malabar’s Agony. Annie Besant (Unlike Mr M.K Gandhi) actually visited the affected areas of Malabar soon after the Moplah rebellion in 1921 and wrote a series of powerful articles about the carnage let loose by the Moplah Muslims which opened the eyes of the government of India and that of Britain. She challenged the stand taken by Mahatma Gandhi on the peaceful and humanitarian overtures of the Moplah Muslims towards non-Muslims in Malabar. I will reproduce her articles in my later posts.

The savagery of the Moplah riots evoked such widespread horror and revulsion that a Committee of Distinguished Citizens was appointed to tour the affected areas. The Committee consisted of K P Keshava Menon, Secretary Kerala Provincial Committee, T V Mohammed, Secretary, Ernad Khilafat Committee, K Madhavan Nair, Secretary, Calicut District Congress Committee and K V Gopal Menon. In their fact-finding report they concluded: “Truth is infinitely of more paramount importance than Hindu Muslim unity or Swaraj and therefore we tell the Maulana Sahib and his co-religionists and India’s revered leader Mahatma Gandhi – if he too is unaware of the events here – that atrocities committed by the Moplahs on the Hindus are unfortunately too true and that there is nothing in the deeds of Moplah rebels which a true non-violent, non-co-operator can congratulate them for … Their wanton and unprovoked attack on the Hindus, the all but wholesale looting of their houses in Ernad, Valluvanad, Poanmani and Calicut Tali; the forcible conversion of Hindus in a few places in the beginning of the rebellion and the wholesale conversion of those who stick to their homes in the later stages, the brutal murder of inoffensive Hindus, men, women and children in cold blood without the slightest reason except that they are Kafirs or belong to the same race as the policemen, who insulted their Tangals or entered their mosques, the desecration and burning of Hindu temples, the outrage on Hindu women and their forcible conversion and marriage by Moplahs; do these and similar atrocities proved beyond the shadow of a doubt by the statements recorded by us from the actual sufferers who have survived, deserve any congratulations? On the other hand, should they not call forth the strongest condemnation from all right minded men and more especially from a representative body of Mohamedans like the Khilafat conference pledged to non-violence under all provocation? Did the Moplahs, who committed such atrocities, sacrifice their lives in the cause of their religion?”

The Congress leaders disgraced themselves at first by disbelieving these heart-rending stories relating to Moplah atrocities, with Duratma Gandhi leading the Anti-Hindu and Pro- Moplah Brigade!’

At the insistence of Duratma Gandhi the Working Committee of the Congress shamelessly whitewashed the criminal atrocities committed by the Moplah Muslims against the Hindus of Malabar by passing the following resolution:
“The Working Committee places on record its sense of deep regret over the deeds of violence done by Moplahs in certain areas of Malabar, these deeds being evidence of the fact that there are still people in India who have not understood the message of the Congress and the Central Khilafat Committee, and calls upon every Congress and Khilafat worker to spread the message of non-violence even under the gravest provocation throughout the length and breadth of India. Whilst, however, condemning violence on the part of the Moplas, the working Committee desires it to be known that the evidence in its possession shows that provocation beyond endurance was given to the Moplas and that the reports published by and on behalf of the Government have given a one-sided and highly exaggerated account of the wrongs done by the Moplas and an understatement of the needless destruction of life resorted to by the Government in the name of peace and order.”

Swami Shradhanand (1856-1926) an Arya Samaj missionary who played a key role on the Hindu Sangathan (consolidation) and the Shuddhi (re-conversion) reform movement had a weekly journal called the ‘Liberator’. Swami Shradhanand wrote in the Liberator of 26th August 1926: “The original resolution condemned the Moplas wholesale for the killing of Hindus and burning of Hindu homes and the forcible conversion to Islam. The Hindu members themselves proposed amendments till it was reduced to condemning only certain individuals who had been guilty of the above crimes. But some of the Moslem leaders could not bear this even. Maulana Fakir and other Maulanas, of course, opposed the resolution and there was no wonder. But I was surprised, an out-and-out Nationalist like Maulana Hasrat Mohani opposed the resolution on the ground that the Mopla country no longer remained Dar-ul-Aman but became Dar-ul-Harab and they suspected the Hindus of collusion with the British enemies of the Moplas. Therefore, the Moplas were right in presenting the Quran or sword to the Hindus. And if the Hindus became Mussalmans to save themselves from death, it was a voluntary change of faith and not forcible conversion—Well, even the harmless resolution condemning some of the Moplas was not unanimously passed but had to be accepted by a majority of votes only.

Though the Subjects Committee meeting proposed to condemn out right the Moplah violence, the resolution finally adopted by the Congress Working Committee put the blame of “provocation beyond endurance given to the Moplahs” on the unarmed Hindus who were disembowelled, dismembered and done to death.

SO ACCORDING TO THE CONGRESS, THE MERE FACT THAT A HINDU IS ALIVE AND BREATHING IS A “PROVOCATION BEYOND ENDURANCE” GIVEN TO THE MUSLIMS, WHO NOW CAN NOW EXERCISE THE DESERT MOON-GOD ALLAH-GIVEN AND DURATMA GANDHI-APPROVED RIGHT TO MASSACRE THE HINDU MAN AND RAPE THE HINDU WOMAN.

At the annual session of the Khilafat Conference in 1923, the President of the session, Maulana Shaukat Ali, the “Muslim Brother” of our so-called Mahatma, praised the Moplahs for their jihad or Islamic religious violence against the Kaffir Hindus. Then the Maulana Shaukat Ali, concealing his Islamic pride, concedes that “some Hindus may have suffered at the hands of the Moplahs”, but then he quickly claims that this horrific event is a “closed book” and publicly announced loud and clear that he and his brother Maulana Muhammad Ali would provide for the maintenance of Moplah orphans.

The Hindus in the Congress did not come forward to help the victims of the Muslim genocide against the Hindus. The Congress Hindus did not want to be labeled “communal”, their minds being so thoroughly enslaved by the evangelical British colonials and their Macaulayized English education that the Congress Dhimmi Hindus felt it a crime to help a suffering fellow Hindu.

Through their Suddhi Movement, the Arya Samaji converted over 2000 Hindus who had been forcibly converted to Islam by the Moplahs. However their leader, the Venerable Swami Shraddhananda had to pay with his life for this service to Sanatana Dharma. The aged Swami was stabbed on 23 December 1926 by another of Gandhi’s “loved Muslim Brothers”, one Islamic terrorist named Abdul Rashid.

On 19 November 1921, about 100 Moplah prisoners were sent by train from Malabar to Coimbatore. They were packed in goods wagons which, of course, had no ventilation. So, when the doors were opened after a five hours’ journey, the prisoners were found to be in a state of collapse, with horrible wounds inflicted by bites and bows in one another by the struggling men. In all, 82 men died. The Congress, which on hearing from its own Committee about the genocide on the Hindus of Malabar by the savage Moplahs glossed over that horror with a mere pat on the back for the Hindu victims was outraged at the treatment the Muslim Moplah mass murderers and rapists received at the hands of the British Indian Police! The Congress immediately passed a resolution declaring that it was ‘an act of inhumanity unheard of in modern times and unworthy of a Government that calls itself civilized’.

While commenting on Gandhi and his policy of Muslim appeasement, behind the façade of non-violence, Sri Aurobindo once said, “India will be free to the extent it succeeds in shaking off the spell of Gandhism.”

The matter did not end here. Due to perpetual insistence by the treacherous Gandhi, the Moplah rogues, who died in police encounter, were later on declared martyrs of the freedom struggle and were allowed to receive allowance, like other freedom fighters, from the government exchequer, after independence and the practice is still in vogue.

The Muslim fanatics who were at the front of the Hindu massacre during the course of the Moplah Rebellion are now christened as freedom fighters and comrades, respectively, by the Congress-led coalition as well as the Communist traitor coalition of political parties in Kerala.

E.M.S Namboothiripad, the Chinese stooge and Marxist traitor in Kerala, created Malappuram as a Muslim-majority district in Kerala, so that the jihadis could start their next partition of India unhindered.

The traitor then gave the genocidal Moplah jihadi rebellion a Marxist class struggle cover by painting that Second Jihad against the Hindus of Malabar as an agrarian labour unrest!!! AGRARIAN LABOUR UNREST, MY BLOODY FOOT!!!

Following the tradition set by masochist Gandhi, the so called secular politicians and liberal English media in Mumbai observe Moplah Day every year and take out procession and hold public meetings in honour of the savages who raped the mothers and grandmothers of the Hindus in Malabar.

According to Smt. K.P Sasikala Teacher, President of Hindu Aikya Vedi, Kerala, “Using public funds the Marxists built memorials for the genocidal jihadi rape-warriors of Moplah Rebellion.
The Hindus of Malabar who have seen
their mothers and sisters raped and carried away as sex slaves,
their fathers and older male relatives flayed alive, burnt alive,
dismembered, disemboweled and done to death
have, now, to perforce, walk past the State-Funded Memorials to jihadi aggressors, with their heads bent in eternal humiliation and indelible disgrace”.

If the Muslim marauders gang-rape the Hindu women and slaughter the Hindu men en masse, then it is merely due to their “non-understanding the message of the Congress”, but if those Muslim rape-warriors get their just dues at the hands of Destiny, the Congress reacts in horror! So it seems the anti-Hindu “Secularism” of the Congress has come down from the pre-Independence times.

The political leader who clearly saw through the Islam-embracing game of Mahatma Gandhi in the years before our independence was Dr B R Ambedkar.

Dr B R Ambedkar described the Muslim Appeasement of Gandhi succinctly: “Gandhi has never called the Muslims to account even when they have been guilty of gross crimes against Hindus. It is a notorious fact that many prominent Hindus who had offended the religious susceptibilities of the Muslims either by their writings or by their part in the Shudhi Movement have been murdered by some fanatic Musalmans. The leading Muslims never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs…. This attitude of the Muslims is understandable. What is not understandable is the attitude of Mr. Gandhi”

http://ghatotkacha-nair.blogspot.com/2010/03/prominent-persons-comments-on-moplah_26.html

Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading

September 23, 2011 at 9:51 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

When thousands of Hindu women were raped and many of them killed by the Moplah Muslims during the Moplah rebellion in August-September 1921, the brutalised women of Malabar led by the senior Rani of Nilambur gave a heart-rending petition to Lady Reading, the wife of Lord Reading, the then Viceroy of India.

Taken from Chapter 5 titled ‘Moplahs’ of the book ANTI-HINDUS by Prafull Goradia and K. R Phanda [2003 ed.]

Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading

To
Her GRACIOUS EXCELLENCY
THE COUNTESS OF READING,
Delhi.

The humble memorial of the bereaved and sorrow-stricken women of Malabar.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR GRACIOUS AND COMPASSIONATE LADYSHIP.

We, the Hindu women of Malabar of varying ranks and stations in life who have recently been overwhelmed by the tremendous catastrophe known as the Moplah Rebellion, take the liberty to supplicate your Ladyship for sympathy and succour.

Your Ladyship is doubtless aware that though our unhappy district has witnessed many Moplah outbreaks in the course of the last one hundred years, the present rebellion is unexampled in its magnitude as well as unprecedented in its ferocity.

But it is possible that your Ladyship is not fully apprised of all the horrors and atrocities perpetrated by the fiendish rebels; of the many wells and tanks filled up with the mutilated, but often only half dead bodies of our nearest and dearest ones who refused to abandon the faith of our fathers; of pregnant women cut to pieces and left on the roadsides and in the jungles, with the unborn babe protruding from the mangled corpse; of our innocent and helpless children torn from our arms and done to death before our eyes and of our husbands and fathers tortured, flayed and burnt alive; of our hapless sisters forcibly carried away from the midst of kith and kin and subjected to every shame and outrage which the vile and brutal imagination of these inhuman hell-hounds could conceive of; of thousands of our homesteads reduced to cinder-mounds out of sheer savagery and a wanton spirit of destruction; of our places of worship desecrated and destroyed and of the images of the deity shamefully insulted by putting the entrails of slaughtered cows where flower garlands used to lie or else smashed to pieces; of the wholesale looting of hard-earned wealth of generations reducing many who were formerly rich and prosperous to publicly beg for a piece or two in the streets of Calicut, to buy salt or chilly or betel-leaf — rice being mercifully provided by the various relief agencies. These are not fables.

The wells full of rotting skeletons, the ruins which once were our dear homes, the heaps of stones which once were our places of worship — these are still here to attest to the truth. The cries of our murdered children in their death agonies are still ringing in our ears and will continue to haunt our memory till death brings us peace. We remember how driven out of our native hamlets we wandered starving and naked in the jungles and forests. We remember how we choked and stifled our babies’ cries lest the sound should betray our hiding places to our relentless pursuers.

We still vividly realise the moral and spiritual agony that thousand of us passed through when we were forcibly converted into the faith professed by these blood thirsty miscreants; we still have before us the sight of the unendurable and life long misery of those — fortunately few — of our most unhappy sisters who born and brought up in respectable families have been forcibly converted and then married to convict coolies. For five long months not a day has passed without its dread tale of horror to unfold.

Your gracious Ladyship’s distracted memorialists have endeavoured without exaggeration, without setting down aught in malice to convey at least some idea of the indescribably terrible agonies which they and thousands more of their sisters have been enduring for over five months now through this reign of inhuman (rightfulness inaugurated and carried on in the name of the Khilafat. We have briefly referred without going into their harrowing details to our heartrending tale of dishonour, outrage, rapine, and desolation.

But if the past has been one of pain and anguish, the future is full of dread and gloom. We have to return to a ruined and desolated land. Our houses have been burnt or destroyed; many of our breadwinners killed; all our property looted; our cattle slaughtered. Repatriation without compensation means for us ruin, beggary, starvation. Will not the benign Government come to our aid and give us something to help us to begin life anew? We are now asked to settle down as paupers in the midst of the execrable fiends who robbed, insulted and murdered our loved ones — veritable demons such as hell itself could not let loose.
Many of us shrink from the idea of going back to what there is left of our homes; for though the armed bands and rebels have been dispersed the rebellion cannot be said to be entirely quelled. It is like a venomous serpent whose spine has been partly broken, but whose poison fangs are still intact and whose striking power, if diminished, has not been destroyed. A few thousands of rebels have been killed and a few more thousands have been imprisoned, but as the Government are only too well aware many more thousands of rebels, looters, savagely militant evangelists and other inhuman monsters yet remain at large, a few in concealment, but most, moving about with arrogance openly threatening reprisals on all non-Moslims
who dare to return and resume possession of their property. Many refugees who went back have paid for their temerity with their lives. In fact, repatriation, if it is not to be a leap from the frying pan into the fire, must mean for the vast bulk of your Ladyship’s impoverished and helpless memorialists and their families a hard inexorable problem of financial help, and adequate protection against renewed hellish outrages from which immunity would be utterly impossible as long as thousands of men and even women and children of this semi-savage and fanatical race in whom the worst instinct of earth hunger, blood-lust and rapine have been awakened to fierce activity- are fret’ to prey upon their peaceable and inoffensive neighbours who — let it be most respectfully emphasised — because of their implicit trust in the power and the will of a just and benign Government to protect them, had suffered their own art and capacity for self defense to emasculate and decay.

We, Your Ladyship’s humble and sorrow-stricken memorialists do not seek vengeance. Our misery will not be rendered less by inflicting similar misery upon this barbarous and savage race; our dead will not return to us if their slayers are slaughtered. We would not be human, however, if we could ever forget the cruel and shameful outrages and indignities perpetrated upon us by a race to which we have always endeavoured to be friendly and neighbourly! We would be hypocritical if, robbed of all our possessions we did not plead for some measure of compensation to help us out of the pauperism now forced upon us; we would be imbecile, if knowing the ungovernable, anti-social propensities and the deadly religious fanaticism of the Moplah race we did not entreat the just and powerful government to protect the lives and honour of our humble sisters who have to live in the rebel-ravaged zone. Our ambition after all is low enough; sufficient compensation to save us and our children from starvation, and enough military protection against massacre and outrage are all that we want. We beseech Your Compassionate Ladyship to exercise all the benevolent influence that you possess with the government to see that our humble prayers are granted. But if the benign government does not consider it possible to compensate us and to protect us in our native land we would most fervently pray that free grants of land may be assigned to us in some neighbouring region which though less blessed with the lavish gifts of nature may also be less cursed by the cruelty and brutality of man.

We beg to remain. Your Ladyship’s most humble and obedient servants,

http://ghatotkacha-nair.blogspot.com/2009/12/petition-of-malabar-ladies-to-lady.html

THE MOPLAH REBELLION

September 23, 2011 at 9:35 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment

THE MOPLAH REBELLION – Part I

Mr Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s first decisive act of Muslim appeasement was the launching of Khilafat Movement in India in 1921. The movement aimed at the restoration of the Sultan on the throne of Turkey as the Khalifa, or the representative of Prophet Muhammad as the spiritual and temporal head of all Sunni Islam.

In the First World War, as it is well known, the Ottoman Empire was defeated and it’s extensive, though decrepit, Arab and African empire was disbanded. The Treaty of Lausanne (23rd July 1923) recognized the new Republic of Turkey as the successor state of the defunct Ottoman Empire. The Ottaman Sultan deposed and forced to renounce his position as Khalifa on 3 March 1924.

The Khilafat Movement in a pan-Islamist move aimed at restoration of the deposed Sultan of Turkey to the position of Khalifa. In India, two Muslim bigots Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali went around barking loudly about restoring the Khilafat. For them the Khalifa represented and provided the means to bring about unity among the Indian Muslims. For the Ali Brothers the restoration of the Khalifa also meant restoration of the supremacy of the minority Muslim in India. At that time the Khilafat Movement consisted of only these two yahoos.

Now enters the fanatic Muslim-appeaser Gandhi who thought this Khilafat Agitation to be an excellent opportunity to curry favour to the violent and therefore hated Muslims on his side in the fight against the British Raj. He then entered the Khilafat Movement with much gusto and even dragged the trusting Congress Party and the gullible Hindus into it, breathing life into an otherwise desultory movement. The Ali Brothers and other Muslim leaders were delighted to have Gandhi leading the Hindus into the Movement to save the throne of their Muslim Religious leader, the Caliph. This, in their view would lead to the establishment of Muslim rule in India.

To understand the confusion in Gandhi’s mind one just has to read Dr B.R Ambedkar’s book Writings & Speeches, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Volume 8, published by the Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, 1990. Gandhi’s comment is as follows:
“In their impatient anger, the Mussalmans ask for more energetic and prompt action by the Congress and the Khilafat organizations. To the Mussalmans, Swaraj means, as it must mean, India’s ability to deal effectively with the Khilafat question. The Mussalmans, therefore, decline to wait if the attainment of Swaraj means indefinite delay of a programme that may require the Mussalmans of India to become impotent witnesses of the extinction of Turkey in the European waters.”

You see here the conceptual confusion of Gandhi. According to Gandhi, Muslims interpret the word Swaraj only as they must interpret according to him! “It is impossible not to sympathise with this attitude. I would gladly recommend immediate action if I could think of any effective course. I would gladly ask for postponement of Swaraj activity if thereby we could advance the interest of Khilafat. I could gradually take up measures outside non-cooperation, if I could think of any, in order to assuage the pain caused to the millions of the Mussalmans.”

So Gandhi not only realizes the extraterritorial loyalties of the Muslims but also condones it!!

“But, in my humble opinion, attainment of Swaraj is the quickest method of righting the Khilafat wrong. Hence it is that for me the solution of the Khilafat question is attainment of Swaraj and vice versa.”

Now Gandhi confuses not only himself but every one else in the hapless Congress party with his confusion. Gandhi puts the Restoration of the decadent Khalipha on the Ottaman throne at the same level as the national imperative of Indian Independence from British Empire!!

For Gandhi, Swaraj was the same as Restoration of the Khalifa and for the Muslims, Swaraj was the same as Restoration of the Khalifa which was in turn the same as Restoration of the Muslim Supremacy in India. Khilafat Movement and Gandhi’s participation along with the Congress created a misunderstanding among the Muslims that Swaraj meant a Hindu submission to the establishment of Muslim Rule. The disastrous consequences of this misunderstanding would be felt all over in India, but it was first felt in Malabar, as we shall see later in this article.

Swami Shradhananda (1856-1926) had a weekly journal called the ‘Liberator’. He was an Indian educationist, an Arya Samaj missionary and he played a key role on the Hindu Sangathan (consolidation) and the Shuddhi (re-conversion) a Hindu reform movement in 1920s. In the ‘Liberator’ issue of July 1926 the Swamiji wrote thus: “There was another prominent fact to which I drew the attention of Mahatma Gandhi. Both of us went together one night to the Khilafat Conference at Nagpur. The Ayats (verses) of the Quran recited by the Maulanas on that occasion, contained frequent references to Jihad and killing of the Kaffirs.But when I drew his attention to this phase of the Khilafat movement, Mahatmaji smiled and said, ‘They are alluding to the British Bureaucracy.’ In reply I said that it was all subversive of the idea of non-violence and when the reversion of feeling came the Mahomedan Maulanas would not refrain from using these verses against the Hindus.” But Gandhi said nothing by way of remonstrance to the Mahomedan Maulanas. What are a few or for that matter, several Hindus killed or converted as long as Gandhi had his way! The seeds of Moplah Jihad against the Hindus of Malabar were sown by the Mahomedan Maulanas in Gandhi’s Khilafat movement and the psychotic Gandhi was looking on with that famous toothless beatific smile.

Why blame only the Ali Brothers for their Pan-Islamism when Gandhi was trying to outdo these Muslim fanatics in Muslim fanaticism?
In the midst of peaceful Hindus Gandhi out did them in peacefulness and in the midst of Muslim fanatics he wanted to be a greater Muslim fanatic.
So if Gandhi went to a wedding, he had to be the bride,
if Gandhi went to a religious function, he had to be the deity and
if Gandhi went to a funeral, he had to be the corpse!!!
His gargantuan ego would not allow it otherwise!!!

Let’s get back to the unwashed Maulanas where we had left them. The Ali Brothers had more than once affirmed their loyalty to the doctrine of PAN-ISLAMISM. Mohammed Ali in 1921 addressed a letter to Amanulla, the Amir of Afghanistan, inviting him to invade India. Unlike the pusillanimous UPA Government in India today, the British Government reacted in an effective way by arresting the traitorous Ali Brothers.

The following statement of Mohammed Ali before the Jury in the Sessions Court with regard to his stand vis-a-vis the Afghan invasion only confirmed his complicity:
“If His Majesty the Amir of Afghanistan is impelled by the same religious motive to contemplate Jehad against those who are in wrongful occupation of the Jazirutal-Arab and the holy places;’ who aim at the weakening of Islam and deny to us the full freedom to advocate its cause,’then the clear law of Islam requires that no Mussalman should render any assistance against the Amir, and if the Jehad approaches his region every Mussalman must join the Mujahidin and assist them to the best of his or her power”.

When Mahatma Gandhi gave a call in 1921 for the burning of foreign cloth by calling it a religious duty of all Indians, all the great leaders like Rajaji, Motilal Nehru, C R Das and millions of our countrymen made bonfire of English cloth. However Gandhi’s “loved Mussalman Ali Brothers” of the Khilafat Movement organized the despatch of foreign clothes from the houses of Indian Muslims for the use of their Muslim brethren in Turkey. For the Ali Brothers of the Khilafat Movement, it was the national Khilafat duty of India to die for Turkey but not vice versa!! The loyalty of the Gandhi’s “loved Mussalman Ali Brothers”, Maulana Mohammad Ali and Maulana Shaukat Ali was always to Turkey and not to India. Gandhi always overlooked this fact.

Gandhi, by involving himself and the Congress in the Khilafat Movement made Pan-Islamism a respectable concept in India and revived its popularity among the Muslims in India and diverted the focus of Muslims in India from national to international issues.

The British Government at that time rightly viewed the Ali Brothers as international Islamic terrorists and jailed them. Hearing of their impending arrest, the Maha-appeaser Gandhi declared at Allahabad on May 10th 1921: “I cannot understand why the Ali Brothers are going to be arrested, as the rumour goes, and why am I to remain free. They have done nothing which I would not do. If they had sent a message to the Amir of Afghanistan, that if he came, no Indian, as long as I can help it, would help the government to drive him back.” Gandhi would commit even treasonable acts in the name of Muslim appeasement. Why did Gandhi become a Muslim appeaser? This would need a separate article.

Moulana Mohammad Ali was even made President of the Indian National Congress at the Kakinada Session in 1923. There he showed his true jihadi colours by trying to prevent the reputed singer and patriot VISHNU DIGAMBAR PALUSKAR from singing the Vande Mataram song saying that music is haraam in Islam. Vishnu Digambar Paluskar retorted: “The Indian National Congress is not the monopoly of one particular sect nor is this place a mosque, where singing could be prohibited. Moreover, if singing in this place is against your particular religion, how is it you could tolerate music in your Presidential procession? You have no authority to prevent me from singing Vande Mataram.” [from ‘Vande Mataram Album’ by V. Sundaram I.A.S, Ennapadam Educational Publishers, 2nd Ed May 2010, Pg 84.] The traitorous Mohammad Ali, “loved Muslim brother” of the Maha-appeaser Gandhi had no answer to this challenge left the dias when Paluskar went on with his rendition of this glorious song-tribute to Bharat Mata to the joyous and heart-felt applause of the audience.

After the War of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. But the Muslim-appeasement by Gandhi taking the form of lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Hindu-Muslim riots. The insurgency we are facing today from the anti-National Muslims today in Kashmir, Assam, Kerala, Bengal and Tripura and the communal tensions in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and other parts of India stem from Maha-appeaser Gandhi’s unconditional support for the pan-Islamic Khilafat Movement in 1920-21.

A bright young lawyer in the Congress warned the opportunist Gandhi against mixing religion with politics. But Gandhi would care no less, after all he wanted to curry favour to the fanatical Muslims and win their approval. The bright young lawyer was thoroughly disgusted with Gandhi’s hypocrisy. He left the Congress and joined the Muslim League, negotiated on equal terms with Gandhi, caused the slaughter of several hundreds of thousands of Hindus and forced the creation of Muslim Pakistan. He was Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the political heir to the alleged “Mahatma”.

Achyut Patwardhan one of the Socialist stalwarts of the Congress, has given a brutally honest analysis of Gandhi’s Khilafat imbroglio: “Apart from the fact that Khilafat was an unworthy reactionary cause, Mahatma Gandhi had to align with a sectarian revivalist Muslim leadership of clerics and maulavis. He was thus unwittingly responsible for jettisoning sane, secular modernist, secular leadership among the Muslims of India and foisting upon the Indian Muslims a theocratic orthodoxy of the Maulavis. Maulana Mohammad Ali’s speeches appear today to be strangely incoherent and out of tune with the spirit of secular political freedom. The Congress Movement which released the forces of religious liberalism and reform among the Hindus and evoked a rational scientific outlook placed the Muslims of India under the spell of orthodoxy and religious superstition by their support to the Khilafat leadership. Rationalist leaders like Jinnah were rebuffed by this attitude of the Congress and Gandhi.”

The remarks of Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair, Member of the Viceroy Executive Council at that time, are interesting:
“It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware of this claim of the Mahomedans to be judged only by the law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kinds. It is as well to be clear about this, for not only the acceptance of the claim means the death knell of the British Empire or Indo-British commonwealth, whatever name he may care to give to the great fraternity of nations to which we belong, but specifically as regards India it means a real denial of Swaraj. For it involves Mahomedan rule and Hindu subjection.” [Gandhi and Anarchy, by Sir C. Sankaran Nair. Tagore & Co. Madras, 1922]

In the meanwhile the Arabs did not want their countries to remain under the control of the Turkish Sultans and Mustafa Kemal, the President of the Turkish Republic abolished the obsolete and unpopular Sultanate as well as the Caliphate. After the martyrdom of Imam Hussein, the Shias did not recognize the Khalifa and therefore did not shed a tear when Mustafa Kemal “Ataturk”, the Father of Modern Turkey, finally abolished the institution of Caliphate and deposed Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid II in 1924 and expelled the latter from Turkey with the rest of his family. Ataturk by his actions cut the ground from under the feet of the Indian champions of that pan-Islamic institution. Khilafat Movement was a mega flop insofar as the restoration of the Khalifa was concerned. Muslims were furious with Gandhi for the failure of the great expectations raised by Gandhi’s participation in the Khilafat Movement.

This treacherous ingrate Mohammad Ali, “loved Muslim brother” of the Maha-appeaser Gandhi paid this tribute in 1924: “However pure Mr Gandhi’s character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without any character.” A year later when he was questioned at a public meeting in Lucknow, the shameless jihadi Muslim Mohammad Ali reiterated: “Yes, according to my religion and creed, I do hold an adulterous and a fallen Mussalman to be better than Mahatma Gandhi.”

No personal insult or abuse from the Muslims and no treasonable acts of the Muslims would deter Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi from his life mission of Muslim-appeasement.

However a frustrated Gandhi exclaimed: “EVERY MUSSALMAN IS A BULLY AND EVERY HINDU IS A COWARD.” Gandhi was transferring his own cowardice on to the Hindus. Gandhi obviously did not know or understand Hindu Kshatriya valour or the brilliant spiritual light of the Hindu Guru parampara which stubbornly resisted Muslimization of India, despite repeated military defeats large scale destruction of temples, genocides, mass slavery, depopulation of cities and held aloft the torch of Sanatana Dharma.

The thoroughly cynical and opportunist alliance between Congress under the leadership of Gandhi with the Khilafat Movement under the Ali brothers was to utilise the violence prone behaviour of Muslims to frighten the British Colonial government into leaving India. Gandhi was very aware of the violent nature simmering in the psyche of the Muslims but he was willing, out of his rancour for the British Raj, to make any, absolutely any, compromise with the Muslims at any cost, to the Hindus, ofcourse! Gandhi’s compromises and concessions to the Muslims to further his political agenda were always at a great cost to the Hindus who trusted, honoured and followed him.

According to Nirad C. Choudhury, “ … all Hindu political leaders were profoundly suspicious of Pan-Islamism and its influence on Indian Muslims…. By allying itself with the Khilafat Movement, the Congress had encouraged most retrograde form of Islamic group consciousness” [Thy Hand Great Anarch- India 1921-1952. pp 38, 39]

“Though the efforts of Khilafat leaders abroad fell like a house of cards, their fury would not abate inside Bharat. The fanatical mullahs and maulavis began to preach to the gullible Muslim masses that India is Dar-ul-Harab”. [The Tragic Story of Partition, by H.V Sheshadri, Sahitya Sindhu Prakasana, Bangalore, 1998 Ed. Pg 63].

Exactly what is this Darul Harab? Well, according to Dr. Jagan Kaul Krishan Bhatnagar, Hindu Jagran Forum (USA), Dar-ul-Harab is a charming little commandment according which, Muslims, when they are not in a hopeless minority, must conduct subversions and act against all human values to leverage their position in the polity and ultimately become rulers (so that they can impose their
misogynist, Arab Supremacist, parasitical, intolerant desert death cult
on those unfortunate enough to live in their midst).

Though the Khilafat Movement had fizzled out in most parts of India by 1921, al taqquiya (or ISLAMIC SACRED LYING) flowered amongst the Muslim Clerics of Malabar.

The Muslim clerics set afloat the propaganda among the Moplah Muslims
that the Khilafat Movement was crowned with success,
that the British regime has come to an end and
that the Khilafat has been reinstated.
Now it was the time to eliminate all kafirs (Hindus!) and establish Dar-ul-Islam,
the Moplahs were told.

The fallout was terrible and gruesome. Moplah fury was first directed against the British. But after police firing and deaths of their own men, the Muslim Moplah cowards turned their wrath against the unsuspecting, unprepared and unarmed hapless Hindus who were, in their bigoted and prejudiced Islamic eyes, as much kafirs as the British. The tragic history of the Moplah Rebellion of 1921 unfolds.

THE MOPLAH REBELLION OF 1921

The seeds of Islamic jihadi fanaticism that were sowed by the Mysorian invaders, Hyder Ali and Tippu Sultan were reaped as bumper harvest during the days of the Moplah Rebellion of 1921.

The Moplahs are a band of fanatic Muslims who have descended from the Arabs trader-pirates who settled in the Malabar Coast in about the 8th or 9th century AD and married mostly Hindu women and created a sizeable population of Muslims.

The Moplahs were illiterate and in their perception English was the language of their enemy and hence education in that language a taboo. They hated even their mother tongue, Malayalam, which they viewed the language of the hated kafir Hindus. Moplah children were admitted to madrasahs run by obscurantist mullahs. A few of them could read and write Malayalam, that also exclusively written in Arabic script only. Over the years they acquired an unenviable notoriety for crimes against non-Muslims perpetrated under the impulse of religious frenzy. They were responsible for 35 riots during the British rule, the most terrible being the one that took place in August-September 1921 known in history as ‘The Moplah Rebellion’.

During the early months of 1921, Islamic excitement spread speedily from mosque to mosque, village to village in the areas in and around Calicut. The violent speeches of the brothers, Mohammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, the early approach of Swaraj as foretold in the non-cooperating press, the July Resolutions of the Khilafat Conference all added fuel to the fire.

All through July and August 1921, Khilafat Meetings were held in which the Karachi resolution was fervently endorsed. Knives, swords etc were secretly manufactured and preparations were made to proclaim the coming of the Kingdom of Islam.

“Many Nair and Brahmin landlords fled the Malabar during Tippu’s jihad against the Hindus leaving their vast wealth behind. The Moplahs forcibly took possession of their lands and wealth. Tippu Sultan did not object to their actions. Most of the Moplah landlords of today claim that they purchased the ownership of the landed properties from Nairs and Brahmins after paying heavy compensation. These blatant lies are being repeated by them in spite of the fact that practically nothing was paid to the Hindu landlords then or later. The same Islamic treachery was repeated during the Moplah riots of 1921. When the British established their rule in Malabar and the Hindu landlords made efforts to recover their landed properties, illegally occupied by the local Moplah, Mullahs started preaching to their fanatic followers that “killing of Hindu landlords was a sacred Islamic act,” leading to frequent Moplah outrages in Malabar.”

“In Cherunad, Vettathunad, Eranad, Valluvanad, Thamarassery and other interior areas, local Moplah unleashed a reign of terror on the Hindu population, mainly to retain the illegally occupied land and to establish their domination over Hindus as during Tippu’s regime. Fearing the organised robberies and violence, people could not even travel freely in the Malabar hinterland of predominantly Moplah population.” [Tippu Sultan, Villain Or Hero. An Anthology. Voice Of India, New Delhi. Article titled ‘Religious Intolerance Of Tippu Sultan.’ By Late P.C.N. Raja]

A fanatic rabble-rousing Muslim cleric named Ali Musliar was proclaimed as Raja of Malabar. Khilafat flags were flown, Ernad and Walluvanad areas were declared as Khilafat kingdoms.

On 20 August, 1921, the District Magistrate of Calicut with the help of British troops attempted to arrest certain leaders who were in the possession of fire arms at Tirur-angaadi. A severe armed encounter took place between the police and the rioters, which was the signal for an immediate rebellion throughout the whole locality. Government properties were systematically attacked by armed mobs then looted and destroyed. The Europeans who did not succeed in escaping the mob fury were murdered. As soon as the administration was paralyzed the Moplahs declared that Khilafat had been established.

The main brunt of the Moplah ferocity was borne, not by the colonial government but by the local Hindus who constituted the majority of the population. The Moplahs found in the local Hindu aristocracy soft targets that they could plunder, slaughter and rape without fear of reprisals. Their wanton and unprovoked jihadi assaults on unarmed and unorganised Hindus resulted in deaths of thousands of Hindus and a very large number of forcible conversions.

The Moplah jihadis then indulged in whole scale plundering of artistically designed beautiful ancient Hindu homes and Hindu temples. Like frenzied animals, they murdered with wild abandon offering Islam or death. Villages after villages were converted to Islam en masse.

Descendants of the ancient Hindu civilization who would not submit to the desert death cult called Islam had to flee from their homes with nothing but their clothes they had on, stripped of everything, even their human dignity.

The cruelty, brutality and horridness of the attack were far-reaching and incomprehensible. The Muslim jihadis had given only two options to the Hindus – either convert to Islam or face death.

Accept the suffocating Peace of Islam or be carved into Pieces.

To those raped and outraged Hindu women who appealed to the Moplahs in the name of Khilafat leader Mahatma Gandhi, the barbarous Moplahs said, “Gandhi is a kafir, how can he be our leader?” So much for Gandhi’s psychotic fetish for Hindu- Muslim amity!

Gandhi refused to blame the Moplahs for the Islamic savagery that they had visited on the unarmed and unprepared Hindu population. Gandhi was so much obsessed by the necessity of establishing Hindu-Moslem unity that he was prepared to make light of the doings of the Moplas and the Khilafats who were congratulating them. He wrote in Young India of 8th September 1921: “It is clear that the Moplahs have succeeded in taking half a dozen lives and have given a few hundred.” In the same article, he praised the Moplahs for being “among the bravest in the land. They are brave God-fearing Moplas who were fighting for what they consider as religion and in a manner which they consider as religious. … Whilst I was in Calcutta, I had what seemed definitive information that there were only three cases of forced conversions … but I do not think it seriously interferes with Hindu-Muslim Unity.” This was Gandhian double-speak at its creative best! Only three cases of forced conversions, the Maha-appeaser Gandhi claims! But still his concern was not for those converted but for his psychotic fetish for Hindu-Muslim Unity at any cost to the Hindus. Let it be known that Sir William Vincent clarified on 16 January 1922 on the floor of the Central Legislature: “The Madras Government report that the number of forcible conversions probably runs to thousands but that for obvious reasons it will never be possible to obtain anything like an accurate estimate.” So much for Truth or Satya in Gandhi’s Satyagraha!

When confronted by the ever increasing mass of evidence of Moplah conducted Genocide against Hindus of Malabar, Gandhi wrote: “Our Moplah brethren have gone mad.” “They have conducted a sin against Khilafat and against their own country.” Within a month the ever irresolute Gandhi changed tack.. “It is wrong to say that Islam employed force.” And then ignoring the thousand odd years of Islamic savagery against the Hindus of India he wrote: “No religion in this world is spread through the use of force.” “No Mussalman to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion.” But even this opportunist, Muslim-appeaser Gandhi in a burst of candour wrote in Young India, on 26 January 1922: The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Volume XXVI, Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcating, Government of India: “New facts were made to suit the principle, instead of performing the impossible act of changing the principle”.

However, the Enquiry Committee of the Servants of India Society submitted a Report to the Government of India in 1921, detailing the actual facts, as opposed to Gandhi’s ‘suitable’ facts, on the ground. The number of Hindus murdered in Malabar District was 1,500, the number forcibly converted to Islam 20,000 and the value of property looted was more than Rs 3 crore at 1921 prices!

The Moplahs let loose an orgy of massacres, forcible conversions, looting, burning desecration and demolition of temples, foul outrages upon women etc freely against the Hindus until the British troops arrived on the scene with fire arms and orders to ‘shoot to kill’ to restore law and order. Among the rioters the number killed was 2,266, wounded 1,615, captured 5,688 and surrendered 38,656. Finally the Khilafat “King” and his merry band of rabid cut-throat rape-warriors fell to British hands.

The Muslim rioters were court-martialled and summarily hanged by the British authorities. Contrast this with the namby-pamby wishy-washy Congress, pussy-footing around the hardened psychotic Muslim criminals of the likes of Afzal Guru who had attacked the Indian Parliament along with well armed and well trained Muslim jihadis from Pakistan.

By the end of 1921 the British Colonial Government had brought under control law and order situation in Malabar.

J. Campbell, Chief of the Central Intelligence Department and even Theodore Morrison, Champion of Muslim separatism, held the Khilafat leaders squarely responsible for inciting Islamic hatred resulting in the Moplah carnage (directed against the Hindus of Malabar). Gandhi had ranked supreme among the leaders of the Khilafat Movement.

http://ghatotkacha-nair.blogspot.com/2009/12/second-jihad-against-hindus-of-malabar.html

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.