SC Deadline to review iodised salt rule

July 22, 2011 at 2:49 pm | Posted in BULLY | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , ,

New Delhi, July 8:The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to review within six months its policy of allowing only iodised salt sales while retaining the ban on the non-iodised variety till then.

Justices R.V. Raveendran and B. Sudershan Reddy refused to enter into a debate on the pros and cons of forcing everyone to consume iodised salt saying it was an issue that health experts should decide.

But it struck down a rule that banned sale of common salt only on the ground that food adulteration rules had such a provision.

The Centre will have to review its policy and if it decides to still retain the existing system of only permitting iodised salt for human consumption, it will have to bring in a fresh law, the judges said earlier this week while disposing of PILs filed by NGOs.

The Academy of Nutrition Improvement, one of the NGOs, argued that the sale of iodised salt should be restricted to iodine-deficient pockets. Some non-iodised salt makers challenged the ban saying it violated their constitutional right to practise any trade, occupation or business. Others said the cost of iodised salt was higher and some MNCs had a monopoly on them.

Section 44H of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 2005, says: “No person shall sell common salt for direct human consumption unless the same is iodised.” The NGOs urged the court to declare the rule unconstitutional.

Although the Centre had propagated the use of iodised salt since 1962 to check iodine-deficiency disorders such as goitre, it was optional for states till May 27, 1998, when the non-iodised variety was banned across the country.

The curbs followed the recommendations of a panel that universal iodisation of salt was a public health need. But experts opposing the ban on common salt have claimed such disorders also occur from water, food and hygiene-related factors.
————————————————-
The iodised salt rule was brought in by the government to help the corporates. Iodised salt creates many health complications when used unnecessarily in non-deficient areas.
The then minister benefited from the legislation.

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: